Anti gun control persuasive essay

Anti gun control persuasive essay

An Argument Against Gun Control Essay

Get custom essay sample written according to your requirements

Urgent 3h delivery guaranteed

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website!

Gun control has become more and more of a hot-button topic in the United States, especially after events like the Sandy Hook shooting in 2012, when many people questioned the necessity of the second amendment in this day and age. Indeed, upholding the second amendment continues to be a difficult prospect when it does not seem like these guns are being used for good. However, the vast majority of people not only use them responsibly, but also protect themselves and their families, using these guns. For this reason, guns should not be limited by the government. Essentially, the issue of gun control boils down to two primary issues that have been in conflict with each other since the founding of America: freedom vs. security. Anti-gun control advocates insist that their guns are necessary for their own security, but also satisfy the freedom requirement by allowing them to freely practice their second amendment rights. Anti-gun advocates see things differently, however, since, to them, having most people in America brandishing a firearm represents a profound security threat to them. However, this security risk that is touted by pro-gun control activists is negated by the need for guns in order to ensure security, and that the odd shooter is a problem with society at large, not the guns themselves.

If gun control were in full effect, and it were made illegal to own a firearm, criminals would simply acquire guns illegally, and would virtually have free reign of whoever they wanted to kill, since law-abiding citizens would not have the means to stop them. Evidence of the effectiveness of firearms as a self-defense tool can be seen in numerous studies. For example, according to a study in 2000, an estimated 989,883 U. S. citizens used some form of gun to defend themselves (Agresti and Smith, 2). In addition, in 1993, 3.5% of households had used a firearm to defend themselves “for self-protection or for the protection of property at home, work, or elsewhere” (Agresti and Smith, 3). These numbers put gun control in a much more positive light, especially from the perspective that they should be used to increase security in an increasingly insecure country. The best way to prevent shooting incidents like the Sandy Hook shooting is not to simply remove all guns, as that will not fix the underlying problem, but to focus on rehabilitating people who either have had violent tendencies in the past, or exhibit symptoms that are consistent with mass shooters.

We will write a custom essay sample on An Argument Against Gun Control specifically for you
For only $16.38 $13.9/page

We will write a custom essay sample on An Argument Against Gun Control specifically for you
FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9 /page

We will write a custom essay sample on An Argument Against Gun Control specifically for you
FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9 /page

Those who support gun control see each person in possession of a firearm, especially those with a concealed weapons license, as another potential Sandy Hook or Virginia State shooting just waiting to happen. That is a valid claim, since the potential is certainly there. The argument that “people don’t kill people, guns kill people” is another popular quote heard in the pro-gun control community, and while it has some merit, it requires some closer examination in order to determine the validity of the statement. While it is certainly true that a gun has the potential to kill someone, it is only a tool. The bigger issue when it comes to violent crimes, especially gun-crimes, is the individual behind the gun. To this end, one of the most effective solutions to the problem of gun violence in this country is to fix the underlying problem, not to simply take away the guns, because that would only invite more violence, especially from the more hardcore gun activists. And, of course, many deaths and injuries from violent crime come from firearms. For example, in 1996, 65 percent of all murders between spouses were performed with a firearm (Rand, 3).

This is where the concept of firearms as a tool comes into play. A criminal who was determined to commit a crime would likely commit the same crime, regardless of whether or not firearms were allowed. Limiting firearms only succeeds in making everybody a potential helpless victim in the event of a shooting. In order to understand how firearms actually work as a deterrent to gun crime, it is necessary to understand that those who use guns for violent purposes (i. e. not in self defense) should be grouped into a different section than those who only use firearms for sport and self-defense. This has actually been done before, and refers to two types of gun ownership: criminal gun ownership and non-criminal gun ownership. For instance, a study taken in 1995 showed that “Where non criminal gun-ownership is higher, criminal gun ownership is also higher; and where criminal gun ownership is higher, the percent of crimes which are committed with guns is higher” (Squires, 197).

Essentially, this means that guns beget more guns, which, in turn, beget more violence, or at least that is what this study shows. However, the issue is a little more complicated than that. For instance, many areas of the nation are simply violent by virtue of their inhabitants, and, even if guns were outlawed, they would still fight amongst themselves using whatever weapons are available. In addition, it is possible that many who live in these areas with large amounts of violence actually purchased guns themselves for the sole purpose of self defense, so that if they themselves were attacked by an assailant using a gun, they would not be completely helpless. Although firearms work well as a way to protect oneself, they also act as a threat of immediate vengeance by the victim, assuming the victim is in possession of a firearm. “A study showed that, in a survey of male felons in 11 state prisons, 34% had been “scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim,” while 40% said they decided not to commit a crime because they knew or believed that the victim was carrying a gun, and 69% said they knew of another criminal who had not committed a crime because the victim had a firearm” (Agresti and Smith, 6).

This helps to show what gun-advocates call the brighter side of the gun-control debate: that guns can, and oftentimes are, used as a self defense or deterrence measure, rather than a pure instrument of violence. This theory seems to hold some water, since a study shows that, in 1988, only about 30% of citizens owned guns. Yet, in 1996, that number had increased to 50% (Lott, 38). In 2004, that number remained steady. The interesting thing about these figures is that violent crime in America has actually been decreasing at a slow rate. While it would be foolish to blame this entirely on guns, it is a good indicator that guns at least function, on some level, as a deterrent and personal defense tool. The only problem, of course, stems from the fact that criminals have guns as well, but allowing virtually anyone to own a gun levels the playing field to an extent. If guns were totally outlawed, encounters would be much more one-sided, as criminals could attack citizens with little to no fear of immediate reprisal on the part of the victim. Gun control is a fairly black-and-white issue, yet seems to only have extremists on one side or the other. While it would be easy to simply dismiss all pro-gun control arguments, they do have some merit.

For this reason, there must be consolations made in order to make guns a little bit safer for everybody. The best way to deal with this issue is continue allowing citizens to use firearms, but perhaps limit access to guns in order to ensure safety for the greatest number of people. Allowing firearms if the gun user registers and carries a permit for the firearm would help to reduce the number of homicides with firearms, if not as many people have them. Each action has its own drawbacks, however, and it is important to understand that, especially for this issue, which has undergone something of a deadlock in the recent past. Freedom and security should be balanced in equal measure, and it is important to come up with solutions to this issue with that in mind.

Agresti, James D., and Reid K. Smith. “Gun Control Facts.” Just Facts (2008). 2-3 Lott, John R. More guns, less crime: Understanding crime and gun control laws. University of Chicago Press, 2013. 37-38 Rand, Michael R., et al. “Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends.” (1998): 1-30. Squires, Peter. Gun Culture Or Gun Control?: Firearms and Violence: Safety and Society. Routledge, 2002. p.197

Argument Against Gun Control Essay

Get custom essay sample written according to your requirements

Urgent 3h delivery guaranteed

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website!

Final Paper: Argument Against Gun Control

The argument on firearm regulation has been a heated discussion for many years. On one side of the debate, we have people in favor placing restrictions on guns, while, on the opposite end of the spectrum, we have people fighting the regulation of guns. People in favor gun restrictions believe gun control can reduce crime, while, the people against gun control believe having the right to bear arms is an effective crime deterrent. I believe that every law abiding citizen should be able to carry a gun and defend themselves against people who intend to harm them. Gun control laws are simply ineffective and they have an adverse effect on crime. Instead of reducing crime, gun control laws just simply take guns out the hands of good people and puts the guns into the hands of the bad guys.

We will write a custom essay sample on Argument Against Gun Control specifically for you
For only $16.38 $13.9/page

We will write a custom essay sample on Argument Against Gun Control specifically for you
FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9 /page

We will write a custom essay sample on Argument Against Gun Control specifically for you
FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9 /page

Gun control laws do not deter criminals from possessing firearms. Whether or not there’s a law restricting gun use, criminal will always find a way to get a gun because criminals are less likely to obey laws. That’s why they are called “criminals”. Also there’s no law that can stop the supply and demand of the illegal arms trade. If there’s money to be made in the black market, someone will profit from it. Criminals can easily obtain a gun through the black market. An unnamed felon was quoted, “There’s guns everywhere. If you got the money you, can get a gun.” If a criminal wanted to get a gun, they are not likely to walk into a store to buy one. Therefore, they could care less whether they had a background check or not. No law can stop criminals from arming themselves to protect themselves. Most criminals have lots of enemies and they rather get caught with a gun than get caught without one. (Stossel).

The more gun control rules and regulations there are, the happier the criminals will be, for they know the more gun laws there are the less chance they have of having a crime victim defend themselves with a lawfully-owned firearm. In many right to carry states, crime statistics are lower than the states with gun laws. The reason why is because guns are used more defensively than criminally. Criminals are usually rolling the dice when they are targeting law abiding citizens in right to carry states. (Polsby) Criminals do not fear the police or other authorities. What they fear most is the citizens who might be potentially armed. It makes it harder for criminals because they do not know what to expect from them if they’re planning to rob them. They’re either fortunate to have an unarmed victim or they become a victim with a citizen that is ready to shoot and defend their families. (Stossel).

Gun control laws only affect the citizens who follow the law. The law does not apply to the criminals. Regardless if theres a gun ban or not, criminals will find a way to obtain guns. The gun laws have no way in curtailing the illegal arms trade. In Chicago, handguns are not for sale legally. Only shotguns, rifles and ammunition can be bought with people with a Firearm Owners Identification Card. The Chicago area is one of the most difficult places to legally obtain a gun.

In order to get a gun license, people have to go through a background check and wait up to a month to legally carry a weapon.(Polsby). While it is difficult to legally possess a gun, it is way more easier to illegally carry a gun in Chicago. There are thousands of unregistered firearms in the streets with thousands more coming in every month. Banning the sale handguns in Chicago makes no difference as well too. People can go elsewhere to buy a gun. They can go out of town or even out of state to buy a gun with Indiana and Wisconsin in close proximity.(Moorhouse and Warner).

Another example why gun control law are ineffective is the staggering increase in crime in England since they imposed a ban on guns. In 1997, England passed a ban on all guns, which makes it illegal for all citizens to carry guns. England’s gun sanctions made it one of the most strictest law in the world. The new law only created an illusion of the country being more safer. Instead of reducing crime, the law put it’s citizens at the mercy of criminals who are well assured that their would be victims are unarmed and defenseless. In the two years after the law was enacted, gun related crimes increased to 40% and armed robberies rose to 53%. From 1997 to 2001, violent crimes more than doubled. People are six times more likely to be robbed at gunpoint in London compared to New York. In the United States, the occurrence of home burglaries is 13% because the majority of burglars fear armed homeowners more than they fear the law. England’s burglary statistics are 5 times higher compared to the United States at 55%. England’s gun ban created the unintended consequences of lawlessness in the streets, as well as, it did not stop criminals from possessing guns and committing crimes. (Malcolm)

Even in the United states where states and cities that passed strict gun laws have found them to be ineffective. The places where gun control laws are the most strictest are places that have the most crimes are committed with firearms.(Piquero). Of the 15 states that have the highest homicide rates, 10 have very restrictive gun laws. New York, for example, has one of the most restrictive gun laws in the nation has 20 percent of the nations total of armed robberies. Another example, Washington D. C., since guns were banned in 1976 the murder rate has risen 200 percent. In Chicago, the city consistently had one of the highest homicide rates in the nation since they enacted a ban on gun in 1982. In May 2010, a month before the Supreme Court overturned the ban, Chicago already had 113 homicides for the year.(Piquero).

Since gun restriction laws were repealed by the Supreme court in 2010, Chicago and Washington D. C. received significantly lower crime rates. The murder rate in Chicago in the first six months of 2011 is 14% lower than the first six months of 2010. This is the first significant drop in the murder rate since gun sanctions were first passed in 1982. In 2008, the Supreme Court lifted the gun ban in D. C. in the case of the District of Columbia vs. Heller. Since the gun ban was repealed, the murder rate in D. C. has dropped 35% from 2008-2010. The rate of assault with weapons decreased by 37% and armed robberies fell as well too by 25% (Lott). These statistics further prove how ineffective gun control laws are. Not only they do not work in reducing crime they create adverse effects on crime. Instead, they make the problems worst.

I believe that the right to bear arms is an unalienable right and I don’t believe that government have that right to take it away. I feel that all citizens have the right to protect themselves and their families. Gun laws restricting the use of guns does not help law abiding citizens. These laws only take away the ability of each citizens to defend themselves and makes us helpless against criminals. Gun control only creates an illusion that a society is safer and it does not solve the root cause crime. One cannot solve the crime problem by just simply taking away guns.

The crime problem goes way deeper than just guns. Criminals will find a way to get guns regardless if theres a strict law or not. Most criminals are opportunist and having a strict gun law only gives them the opportunity to commit more crime with less worry about that person being armed. I believe that there is other ways to fight crime, however, I don’t believe gun control is the answer to making our world a safer place.

Outstanding Gun Control Essay: 10 Catchy Titles + 5 Latest Sources

After the recent heartbreaking mass shootings, the gun control debate has reached its boiling point.

Do we need gun control laws? Should everyone own a gun for self-defense? You have the opportunity to air your opinion in a gun control essay.
Below, you’ll find everything you need to write a great paper in no time – weighty arguments, catchy titles, and the latest sources on the topic.

Don’t forget to check our website and get your assignment done just in a few hours.

Take a stand in the gun control debate

Did you know that 33 people are killed with guns every day in America?
This is one of the numbers you can use in your essay on gun control. Are you ready to learn more reasons both for and against gun control? Here they are, in a nutshell:

  • Guns make it easy to kill or injure a person, or even many people, in a short timeframe.
  • When owing a gun, there is a 43 times higher likelihood of killing a family member, friend, or neighbor than an intruder.
  • The prevalence of suicide is 5 times higher in homes having guns.
  • “Guns don’t kill, people do.”
  • Self-defense, hunting, and collecting are all legitimate purposes for owning a gun.
  • Criminals can continue to hurt others even without legally owning guns.

Have you chosen your standpoint? Great! Now you sound like you know all the sides of the issue.

The courses above will help you to write an outstanding essay on gun control. Moreover, you can easily to proofread it by Grammarly and avoid common grammar mistakes.

10 catchy titles and fresh ideas for essays on gun control

Do you know what’s another step toward your A+ gun control essay? It’s a catchy title that emotionally expresses your standpoint and grabs your readers’ interest.

Here are some examples.

Pro-gun control papers:

  1. More guns – more violence
  2. Stop the wrong people from getting guns
  3. Revision of the Second Amendment to prevent human tragedies
  4. The Second Amendment and gun control can co-exist
  5. The thin line between self-defense and deadly force

Anti-gun control papers:

  1. Gun control is not the answer – education is
  2. Gun culture propaganda starts with cartoons
  3. Mass media is to blame: murder is an easy route to fame
  4. Gun control: why not ban everything that poses a potential threat?
  5. Criminals don’t obey gun control laws

5 latest resources for gun control essays

Got a catchy title and weighty arguments for your paper?
Good, but don’t go away so fast, please. We’ve got one more pleasant bonus for you. Don’t forget to include citations from authoritative sources in your papers:

Need more information to start writing your gun control essay? Keep reading.

Pros and Cons of Gun Control

Gun control pros and cons have been discussed and thoroughly analyzed in gun control debates innumerable times, but both advocates and opponents of gun control have stuck to their positions, leaving the issue unresolved. Here are a few important gun control pros and cons.

Points made in support of gun control (pros)

  1. Gun control statistics reveal that although the United States accounts for only 5% of the world’s population, U. S. residents own 50% of guns in the world.
  2. When gun deaths statistics for different countries were expressed as the number of gun deaths in a population of a million people, the United States was ranked below South Africa.

Points against gun control (cons)

  1. The very idea of gun control goes against the principle of democracy that allows people the right to safeguard their lives. People need guns to defend themselves when being attacked by others. In fact, gun crime statistics show that uncontrolled gun ownership will lead to more gun crime and ultimately to anarchy. And the objective of gun control is to prevent anarchy, not gun ownership. That’s why this argument does not carry much weight.
  2. Since gun ownership is a right sanctioned by the Second Amendment, it should not be restricted. However, we should take into account the fact that 99% of this amendment was based on information provided by people with no college education, let alone any legal education. Plus, it is unreasonable to think that this right cannot be restricted. In fact, any law can be modified, restricted, or even removed by a subsequent law. So if we take into consideration the above mentioned facts, it appears that gun control pros are stronger.

3 steps in writing a gun control essay

Writing an impressive essay on gun control can be a bit difficult without proper organization. No matter what type of essay you are going to write—a persuasive gun control essay, a compare and contract essay on gun control, a cause and effect gun control essay, or a narrative essay on gun control (n case you have a good imagination)—you’ll need some detailed planning and thorough research.

Follow these three steps to write a perfect gun control essay.

  1. Whether you are writing an argumentative, expository, research, or any other type of gun control paper, the first thing to do is to define what gun control is. Use the definitions that are most appropriate for your essay. For example, you might start with a dictionary definition and then add some general facts about types of firearms. Next, you might give statistics on gun control such as ownership and reason for ownership.
  2. In the body of your essay, you should present other important facts and issues on the topic of gun control.
  • You can use studies conducted on gun control over the years for some additional gun control statistics.
  • If you are writing a pro-gun control essay, you can use studies or statistics on how guns owned by private citizens have killed innocent people. You can also cite cases when students have used their parents’ guns to commit violent crimes in school.
  • If you are writing an against gun control essay, cite studies proving that private gun ownership saves lives or other research revealing the positive effect of gun ownership.

Of course, the content and organization all depend on your particular essay. The facts remain the same, but it is the way that you arrange and present the facts in your gun control essay that will create a concrete argument. That’s why you should make sure you do an outline to properly arrange the facts in your essay.

  1. Finally, write a strong conclusion to your essay on gun control. In the conclusion, you should summarize the essay and reiterate the most important facts. Then you should give your conclusion, a strong statement based on the facts in your essay. If it’s not an argumentative essay, present your findings and suggestions about the issue.

As you can see, writing an impressive gun control essay takes time and effort, and it requires deep research. If you’re finding this task too challenging, you can order a custom written essay from our custom writing service. We provide 100% original custom written papers at reasonable prices.

[/H1toH2]