Argument essay paper example
Argument essay paper example
Look at these critical essays written by Sussex students (click on the essay image to view). Think about what we covered in the section on Critical writing and ask yourself if the essays fit with this guidance. How easy is it to follow the student’s argument? How do they use evidence to support their argument? Think about the feedback you would give and compare it with the tutor’s feedback.
Second year student: English Literature essay
Discuss the relation between narrative style and moral judgement in Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness [pdf 117KB]
Tutor’s feedback — 75%
This is an astute, and often sophisticated, essay which makes its arguments cogently. One of its strengths is that you are making excellent use of citation both to support your points but also to move your argument along (for example, see double ticks on pp.3-4). There is also significant independent reading to secure an original, thoughtful approach to the question. Though tendentious, the topic is broached with a real flair for critical analysis (one is well aware of the limits of Hampson’s defence of Conrad through the paragraph on p.5). Your conclusion is deft, with a very strong sense of the complexity of the issues. There is also the possibility, of course, that Conrad might identify with Marlow while at the same time undercutting his ‘racism’ not by expressing alternative perceptions but by plotting (see Peter Brooks, READING FOR THE PLOT as one way into this; Toni Morrison’s PLAYING IN THE DARK is another take on Achebe’s position).
Second year student: international Security essay
Discuss with examples how and why major international actors have been perceived as failing the victims of genocide [pdf 98 KB]
Tutor’s Feedback — 73%
This is a well structured and fluently written essay with a clear argument, well done. The examples are appropriate and the evidence and quotations you have chosen highlight your argument well. Excellent set of readings.
You could do more to say specifically why Bosnia, Rwanda and Armenia are cases of genocide at the start of the essay? perhaps compare them against the UN Convention. You say they are all cases of genocide, but are they all exactly the same? Are there any differences between them that are of importance when considering outsiders’ failure to prevent/end them?
To push your argument further, think about the reasons why major international actors fail the victims of genocide: you give a few reasons, such as political and economic interests, reputation, the desire to avoid costly and indeterminate conflicts, UN bureaucratic inertia and so on. Could you systematise these at all? Are the reasons the same in each case, such that you can make a general claim, or does it vary case by case?
In the bibliography, make sure you give the publisher of books.
Second year student: Issues in Contemporary Anthropology essay
Explore the meaning of ‘radical evil’ and the ‘banality of evil’ and how they might relate to understandings of evil using the cases of Idi Amin and Adolf Eichmann [pdf 50 KB]
Tutor’s Feedback — 75%
Deals confidently with very complex issues (Arendt’s ‘banality of evil’ vs Zizek’s ‘radical evil’). Focuses on Leopold’s work, but extends it considerably. Rather longer than expected, but a well constructed argument, and generally well written (however p.2 ‘Disobeying orders was not an option for Eichmann. As a result conveying their agency the other Nazi officials do not qualify as banal’ is unclear & may misrepresent Arendt’s argument p.3 some confusion over Pottier’s & Leopold’s position. ). Interesting and original attempt to compare Arendt’s analysis with Zizek’s in relation to Amin. The conclusion needs more explanation about what is meant by ‘everyday understandings of evil. what one refers to with the word in the on a daily basis’ (sic) (Shame to have such a typo in the final sentence!). Nevertheless, a very good, thoughtful and original argument.
Third year student: English literature essay
Laurence Sterne and the Erotic: The Depiction of Sensibility in ‘A Sentimental Journey’ [pdf 99 KB]
Tutor’s Feedback — 78%
This essay is clearly-written with a an intelligent, incisive style. The piece is well-presented and very thoroughly researched. I especially liked the essay’s alertness to the cultural and philosophical contexts of sensibility. In covering this topic, you used critical and historical sources to support, rather than to dictate, your analysis. Consequently, you convey a strong sense of engagement with, and ownership of, the material. Excellent work.
Second year student: English literature essay
Is Tess in ‘Tess of the d’Urbervilles’ portrayed as being responsible for her own demise? [pdf 40 KB]
Tutor’s Feedback — 73%
Yours is a beautifully clear essay. You write very well, and your prose is delightful to read. You’ve also done your research and it shows. There is a remarkable lack of vagary about society or feminism in your piece, and you’ve picked canny quotes from your secondary sources that elucidate and situate your arguments.
You’ve also located some wonderfully specific quotations from your primary source to support your argument that Hardy’s narrator sympathises with Tess. Some of your close readings are wonderfully astute, as when you point out that Tess implores Angel, rather than commanding him. Slightly less persuasive is your assertion that Tess is the victim of Alec’s eyes; I suspect you might have found better quotations, descriptions, or incidents denouncing Alec’s gaze.
You are clearly very good at pursuing and proving an argument. I encourage you to be a bit more experimental in your next essay; perhaps choose a less straightforward topic and see where it takes you.
Please see penciled notes throughout on shortening sentences and watching for comma splices (please look this term up in a style manual if it is unfamiliar).
Second year student: Biomedical science essay
Discuss the new insights in the understanding of Haemolytic Uraemic Syndrome and its worldwide implications following the large scale outbreak of E. Coli O104:H4 diarrhea in Germany 2011 [pdf 680KB]
An outstanding essay which shows a complete understanding and an ability to think around the topic, especially with regards to the pathogenic features. Very good evidence and an indepth discussion, which highlights the role of the unique features of the German outbreak. Also, good use of evidence to highlight the unusual epidemiology. The essay is logical, moves step by step in the sequence of events chronologically. Excellent presentation. Very good use of diagrams, especially the one on the plasmids. Good referencing. Very minor errors highlighted on script. Download the script for more detailed tutor feedback [737 KB]
Argumentative Essay Paper: Definition & Examples
Want to watch this again later?
Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course.
Recommended Lessons and Courses for You
An Argumentative essay uses evidence and facts to prove whether or not a thesis is true. It presents two sides of a single issue, and covers the most important arguments for and against. People sometimes confuse the argumentative essay and the persuasive essay. The persuasive essay relies heavily on emotional and ethical appeals to persuade readers, and the argumentative essay does not.
Argumentative Essay Structure
The argumentative essay has the same structure as other types of essays. It has a thesis statement, an introductory paragraph, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
The introduction to your argumentative essay should engage your readers. Let’s say your topic is about social media; you might say that it has changed the world, and then follow up with some statistics that support that. Write a sentence or two about your own experiences with social media. The last sentence in your introduction should be your thesis statement.
Each body paragraph after the introduction should have a topic sentence with an argument. One argument might be that social media helps society. Follow this with supporting details, which in this case might be that Facebook helps military families stay in touch, or that it aids social causes by finding funds for under-served populations (if true).
Get access risk-free for 30 days,
Just create an account.
No obligation, cancel anytime.
Select a subject to preview related courses:
Support your arguments with evidence that your reader will recognize as reliable, such as peer-reviewed articles from the library database, polls, and studies from well-known sources, and be sure to include in-text citations for any quotes and paraphrases. Base any conclusions on solid logic, and use transitions to the subsequent paragraphs, repeating this process. Avoid any irrelevant details that will distract from the thesis.
Briefly summarize the most important arguments in the conclusion. You will address what the skeptics say and offer your readers a look to the future. Will concepts like Facebook last? What are your thoughts about the possibilities of new forms of social media? These points will give your readers something to think about when they finish reading your essay.
Carefully proofread your essay, making sure that you’re not undermining your arguments with errors in grammar, spelling, and writing mechanics. All of your hard work can be lost if you leave out this important step. Also check for logical fallacies. Some examples of fallacies based on the social media topic would be:
- People who don’t want to use social media are either anti-social or misinformed.
- If you are active on social media, your personal life will improve greatly.
An Argumentative essay uses evidence and facts to prove whether or not a thesis is true and presents two sides of a single issue. This type of essay includes an introductory paragraph, body paragraphs and a conclusion. After finishing your essay, you should proofread carefully for errors and logical fallacies.
The site you are trying to access is being protected from ‘Malicious Bots’
And we have detected ‘Unusual traffic from your computer network’
PulseOrPlug uses Googles’ reCAPTCHA service to protects your website from spam and abuse. reCAPTCHA uses an advanced risk analysis engine and adaptive CAPTCHAs to keep automated software from engaging in abusive activities on your site. It does this while letting your valid users pass through with ease.
Google reCAPTCHA is the most widely used CAPTCHA provider in the world. Our broad installed publisher base provides an unparalleled view into abusive activity on the internet, so the bad guys cannot hide. reCAPTCHA knows when to be tough to keep the bots at bay from a website.
Protects and Defends
ReCAPTCHA is built for security. Armed with state of the art technology, it always stays at the forefront of spam and abuse fighting trends. reCAPTCHA is on guard for you, so you can rest easy.
Hard for Bots
Making the Internet safer and faster. Our system runs risk analysis behind the scene and enables 99% of human users to pass through with zero click everyday. Now even mobile users can enjoy their apps without being interrupted, while still staying away from spam and abuse.
Easy for People
Purposefully designed. And actively aware. Our security check knows when to be easy on people and hard on bots. Google’s easy CAPTCHAs are a breeze for legitimate users.